[GRASS5] Proposal: RFC 1: Project Steering Committee Guidelines
radim.blazek at gmail.com
Thu Apr 27 07:37:08 EDT 2006
I think that all contributors should have a possibility to vote not only
PSC members. I don't see any point in delegating votes from
about 10 persons to some 5 PSC members. Why people doing
a lot of work for GRASS who don't have time for or don't want to become
PSC members should not participate in decision process?
My proposal is that PSC prepares only a question for voting
and all 'contributors with vote' can vote about it. The proposal
passes if majority of 'contributors with vote' votes for the
proposal (clear majority, no vetos).
'Contributors with vote' will be all contributors (not only developers)
who did substantial contributions to the project. Initialy it can be persons
mentioned as candidates for PSC. New 'contributors with vote'
can be accepted by voting.
On 4/26/06, Markus Neteler <neteler at itc.it> wrote:
> Dear all,
> to better illustrate the idea of a GRASS Project Steering Committee (PSC),
> I have drafted a document:
> RFC 1: Project Steering Committee Guidelines
> In CVS: rfc/RFC1_PSC.dox
> The content is heavily inspired by the related documents from the
> GDAL, Mapserver and Mapbender projects.
> As stated in this document: It is desired to keep the administrational
> overhead as low as possible. However, for strategic decisions a more
> formal approach for decisions is needed.
> Please take a look and comment since it is a Request for Comments (RFC).
> Best regards
> Markus Neteler <neteler itc it> http://mpa.itc.it
> ITC-irst - Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica
> MPBA - Predictive Models for Biol. & Environ. Data Analysis
> Via Sommarive, 18 - 38050 Povo (Trento), Italy
> grass5 mailing list
> grass5 at grass.itc.it
More information about the grass-dev