[GRASS-dev] WxPython prototype GRASS GUI. Version 2

Glynn Clements glynn at gclements.plus.com
Wed Aug 9 00:08:08 EDT 2006


Markus Neteler wrote:

> > But the 6.1 branch is less than a month old. How many fixes can there
> > be which can't easily be merged into 6.1.x?
> > 
> > I'm not sure that having two stable versions based upon HEAD snapshots
> > only a month apart makes sense.
> 
> I don't see a big difference (result) between
> (a) branching again
> (b) merging many things back

The difference is that (b) allows you to choose which changes to
merge, i.e. include simple bug fixes but not more destabilising
changes.

> The latter is much more effort. I currently have no time to
> do more backporting of changes. That's why I proposed (a).

In that case, my inclination would have been to simply move the 6.1
branch tag to the point where 6.2 would have been created. There
doesn't appear to be much point in having an isolated 6.1 release for
which any bugs will never be fixed.

For me, the main question is: what would be the reason for a user to
choose 6.1.0 over 6.2.0?

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>




More information about the grass-dev mailing list