Anybody object to activating this module in the GRASS 6.2 release branch? Hamish Sören wrote: > not critical, but i think r.to.rast3elev is stable enough and offers a > lot of nice features. Some users also requested this module in grass > 6.2, but i missed the release termin. > > So it would be nice to have r.to.rast3elev in grass 6.2.1.