[GRASS-dev] Re: [bug #4437] (grass) v.in.ascii & 'Vector ASCII
Format Specification' differ
Hamish
hamish_nospam at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 5 10:12:30 EDT 2006
"v.in.ascii & 'Vector ASCII Format Specification' differ"
https://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=4437
Markus:
> > > am I right that Hamish updated the manual?
yes, sorry I should have closed this bug some time ago.
[doing so now]
Maciek:
> > There was an update in the v.in.ascii manual.
more to the point, the vector specification linked below was updated to
meet reality.
> > However, there are still differences between the manual and
> > http://freegis.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/grass6/doc/vector/vector.html#ascii
> > regarding vector feature types.
> >
> > v.in.ascci is missig the lowercase ("mark as deleted") types.
I don't think it's a problem, the lower case versions aren't worthy of
mention in the v.in.ascii help page as they represent deleted features
which will be skipped during import.
> > Are they still supported in Grass 6.1?
yes, but that just means that they are ignored.
> > v.in.ascii man contains more usefull comments which are missing in
> > "GRASS 5.7/6 Vector Format and API" description.
the vector format specification is not a tutorial.
which comments do you think should be added to the specification?
> > I believe both documents should give exactly the same information,
> > to avoid confussion.
yes, the technical info should (& does?) match, but I don't think we
should clutter the specification with redundant examples.
> > I don't know what is the right, actuall information though.
no erroneous info should remain. reopen the bug if you see a conflict.
Hamish
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list