R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS5] r.li (landscape indices)

[Davide Spano]

Hi all,
I think it's better to use capital letters  i.e. r.li.patchNumber for
all indexes...


pallecch at cli.di.unipi.it ha scritto:
> hi, I'm thinking about the new names for r.li indexes
>
> All the original names are:
>
> r.li.shannon
> r.li.simpson
> r.li.edgedensity
> r.li.contrastWeightedEdgeDensity
> r.li.meanPatchSize
> r.li.patchAreaDistributionCV
> r.li.meanPixelAttribute
> r.li.patchAreaDistributionSD
> r.li.patchAreaDistributionRange
> r.li.dominance
> r.li.richness
> r.li.patchdensity
> r.li.shape
> r.li.patchnumber
>
> Do you think it's best:
>
> r.li.shannon
> r.li.simpson
> r.li.edgedensity
> r.li.contrastweightededgedensity
> r.li.meanpatchsize
> r.li.patchareadistributioncv
> r.li.meanpixelattribute
> r.li.patchareadistributionsd
> r.li.patchareadistributionrange
> r.li.dominance
> r.li.richness
> r.li.patchdensity
> r.li.shape
> r.li.patchnumber
> (I think some names aren't readble)
>
> or:
> r.li.shannon
> r.li.simpson
> r.li.edgedensity
> r.li.contrastwed / r.li.cwed
> r.li.meanps / r.li.mps
> r.li.padcv
> r.li.meanpa / r.li.mpa
> r.li.padsd
> r.li.padrange / r.li.padrk
> r.li.dominance
> r.li.richness
> r.li.patchdensity
> r.li.shape
> r.li.patchnumber
> (I think people don't remember the meant of some names)
>
>
> Please tell me what you prefer.
> -serena-
>
>