[GRASS-dev] r.le--after some fixes still needs work

[Paolo Cavallini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Agreed fully. These are the reasons why we started with r.li. Modularity
is only useful to include new indices as someone will find them useful.
A good thing is the client-server architecture and the parallel
computing. Please do find the time to have a look. I'm sure with your
contribution we'll get a good replacement for r.le in a short time.
Please do not hesitate posing questions (preferrably on the r.li mailing
list) if anything is not clear.
All the best.
pc

William L. Baker ha scritto:

> The chief advantage r.le had over FRAGSTATS and other programs not part of a GIS 
> was r.le.setup, which allowed a diversity of sampling approaches, the moving 
> window option (now FRAGSTATS has that), and integration within GRASS where 
> output maps can be analyzed by other GIS programs. But, I still have not had the 
> time to look at r.li!
> 
> Bill
- --
Paolo Cavallini
email+jabber: cavallini at faunalia.it
www.faunalia.it
Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy   Tel: (+39)348-3801953
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFHrR0/NedwLUzIr4RArJ1AJ96c1pR9KfZeN9HrIZf3wkcZVPoLQCgnal2
5RW43oKkrWLzF2edcWJxOgk=
=5Hus
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----