[GRASS-dev] Re: v.generalize and interpolation, dmax problem

[Paul Kelly]

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Helena Mitasova wrote:

[Interesting/impressive test results...]

> which brings me to the main question - are there any objections to make dmax 
> default value
> as large as the region to make sure that it does not add any points
> (currently it is set to 1.25 resolution value which is obviously not enough)?
> I have been trying to eliminate this parameter for years
> as it usually causes more problems than it solves.

For 7.x perhaps you could drop both the dmin and dmax parameters, and add 
a note to the man page suggesting that the user preprocess their contour 
data with v.generalize to resolve issues with closely-spaced points, 
before running v.surf.rst?

Just a thought

Paul