[GRASS-dev] v.in.dwg: status in GRASS 6.2.2, DWGdirect, etc.

Markus Neteler neteler at itc.it
Sat Sep 15 17:16:36 EDT 2007



Glynn Clements wrote:
> 
> It doesn't make any difference whether the libraries are static or
> dynamic.
> 
> Unless you can supply the OpenDWG/DWGDirect source code under a
> GPL-compatible licence, you cannot distribute a binary which is linked
> (statically or dynamically) against both the GRASS libraries and the
> DWG libraries.
> 
> -- 
> Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
> 

Right.

Maybe it is worth to look at how gvSIG solves this
http://www.gvsig.gva.es/index.php?id=faq-preguntas-tec&K=1&L=2
?
Take out their lib/driver and use that also for us? Seems to be here
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=151469

Their CVS:
http://gdbms-plugins.cvs.sourceforge.net/gdbms-plugins/gdbms%20drivers/src/main/java/com/hardcode/gdbms/driver/dwg/
but the real code seems to be elsewhere.

Markus
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/v.in.dwg%3A-status-in-GRASS-6.2.2%2C-DWGdirect%2C-etc.-tf4446146.html#a12693948
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




More information about the grass-dev mailing list