[GRASS-dev] v.in.dwg: status in GRASS 6.2.2, DWGdirect, etc.

[Glynn Clements]

brush wrote:

> > When compiling from source, one thing to bear in mind is that you also
> > need the development packages (with the headers and .so symlinks) for
> > each dependency.
> > 
> > > goodness, it would be nice to have a script to do this!
> > 
> > Installing dependencies is highly platform-specific. Once you have all
> > of the dependencies, "configure ; make ; make install" will often
> > suffice if you don't need some of the less common features.
> 
> ok: then it seems to me i should install a precompiled version of 6.3,
> and then build v.in.dwg alone using the Makefile fragments.  is that
> correct?  this will avoid having to have development pkgs for
> dependencies...

You may still need development packages for some of the dependencies;
PROJ and GDAL/OGR are the most likely candidates.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>