R: [GRASS-dev] New GRASS Icons and Windows
marco.pasetti at alice.it
marco.pasetti at alice.it
Wed Apr 23 06:18:31 EDT 2008
Hi Martin,
could you give me the original images, please? When I extract them from the windows icons I have a significant quality reduction. The format doesn't care, I can manage every image format.
Thanks,
Marco
PS: did you received my mail about wxPython location wizard?
________________________________
Da: Martin Landa [mailto:landa.martin at gmail.com]
Inviato: mer 23/04/2008 12.03
A: marco.pasetti at alice.it
Cc: Hamish; GRASS Developer Mailing List
Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-dev] New GRASS Icons and Windows
Hi,
2008/4/23, marco.pasetti at alice.it <marco.pasetti at alice.it>:
> if you want (and if you consider that appropriate) I could prepare multiple
> icons for windows, with the following format: 16,24,36,48 and 64 px
> waiting for reply... ;-)
multiple sizes within the same icon file would be ok.
Martin
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco
>
> ________________________________
> Da: grass-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org per conto di Marco
> Pasetti
> Inviato: mar 22/04/2008 1.17
> A: 'Hamish'; 'GRASS Developer Mailing List'
> Oggetto: R: [GRASS-dev] New GRASS Icons and Windows
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Hamish,
>
> >ISTR that Windows's .ico files could store multiple sizes within the same
> file, yes?
>
> Yes, right!
> In the image I posted, the icon on the right is *multiple* icon, containig 4
> icons: 16,24,36 and 48 px
>
> Marco
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Hamish [mailto:hamish_b at yahoo.com]
> Inviato: lunedì 21 aprile 2008 23.44
> A: Marco Pasetti; GRASS Developer Mailing List
> Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-dev] New GRASS Icons and Windows
>
>
> Marco Pasetti wrote:
> > I think that there's a small *issue* with the new icons in Windows: I
> > don't know how is the story on Vista (it seems it's becoming to be a
> > problem developing on Windows and not having Vista to do tests...),
> > but on XP icons must come as multiple icons to do a *good job*; on
> > Linux that's not a problem, but XP just resizes icons and doesn't
> > resample them (and that matters if they need to be displayed in a size
> > different from the original).
> > GRASS icons are in 64px size, while windows commonly uses 16 and 32px
> > size.
> >
> > I usually make icons in multiple format with the following sizes: 16,
> > 24, 32 and 48 px. Using only the 64px size the icons on windows, even
> > at 32px size, seem less definite and, surely, not beautiful as the
> > originals. I attached an example that shows how icons appear on
> > windows at 32px size (the most used, along with 16px size): on the
> > left the original, on the right the modified version (I resized the
> > original 64px icon to 16,24,32, and 48px images and saved all as
> > multiple icon).
>
>
> AFAIK lib/init/grass.ico is Windows specific, so Windows-ize it as needed.
> ISTR that Windows's .ico files could store multiple sizes within the same
> file, yes?
>
>
> Hamish
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20080423/0239644d/attachment.html
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list