[GRASS-dev] r.mfilter vs r.mfilter.fp

Michael Barton michael.barton at asu.edu
Sun Dec 28 12:07:59 EST 2008



On Dec 28, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu 
> > wrote:
>> Why do we have both r.mfilter and r.mfilter.fp?
>> I'm guessing that r.mfilter.fp works on floating point maps (or  
>> perhaps it
>> produces floating point maps?). A quick read did not explain the  
>> difference.
>
> It looks like a clone to me (with the FP changes being the  
> difference).
> Not sure if this still justifies the existence of r.mfilter.
>
> Markus

Or perhaps the current m.filter should be replaced by the code in  
m.filter.fp?

Michael


More information about the grass-dev mailing list