[GRASS-dev] r.mfilter vs r.mfilter.fp
Michael Barton
michael.barton at asu.edu
Sun Dec 28 12:07:59 EST 2008
On Dec 28, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu
> > wrote:
>> Why do we have both r.mfilter and r.mfilter.fp?
>> I'm guessing that r.mfilter.fp works on floating point maps (or
>> perhaps it
>> produces floating point maps?). A quick read did not explain the
>> difference.
>
> It looks like a clone to me (with the FP changes being the
> difference).
> Not sure if this still justifies the existence of r.mfilter.
>
> Markus
Or perhaps the current m.filter should be replaced by the code in
m.filter.fp?
Michael
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list