R: [GRASS-dev] Can I trust libtool?

[Marco Pasetti]

Good news
Thanks ;-)

MP


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: grass-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:grass-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] Per conto di Ivan Shmakov
Inviato: lunedì 11 febbraio 2008 19.14
A: grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov
Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-dev] Can I trust libtool?

>>>>> <marco.pasetti at alice.it> writes:

 > Hi, I started to build on Windows (MSYS/MinGW) latest releases of  >
GRASS required libraries (zlib, libpng, and so on...) and I thought  >
everything was going well... but (occasionally) browsing /usr/lib  > dir I
found NO dlls of what I built, only .a and .la libraries,  > while I found
dlls in /usr/bin...

[...]

	I'm not familiar with W32, but IIRC, the dynamic libraries are
	searched in PATH on W32.  Since /usr/bin is much more likely to
	be in PATH than /usr/lib, I deem this behaviour as correct.

	There're bugs in any software, and libtool is hardly an
	exception, but after using it for quite some time, I'd say that
	it's reliable enough.

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev