[GRASS-dev] Manpage HTML markup consistency

[Hamish]

> Eric:
> > Is there any preferred way for using html markup for tagging module
> names, parameter names, and flags in the document html pages?

Martin Landa wrote:
> AFAIK not really.

I think you will find that they are in fact quite consistent already.
(with lots of exceptions)


> * <h2>See also</h2>
> <em>
> <a href="module1.html">module1</a>,
> <a href="module2.html">module2</a>
> <em>
> 
> instead of
> 
> <em>
> <a href="module1.html">module1</a>,<br>
> <a href="module2.html">module2</a>
> <em>

I have never really had a good answer for that: for a few entries all
on one line looks ok, for many entries it is much easier to scan down a
one module per line. In general Markus has put them across, I have put
them one per line. shrug, just a matter of preference I guess.

In general SEE ALSO modules are listed in alphabetical order, but
sometimes important ones have been put first. shrug.

If referencing external software or PDF/PostScript guides linked from
the website put a paragraph break between them and the modules (modules
come first).

I expect there are many dead links to non-ported GRASS 5 modules and
many help pages may talk of obsolete interactive mode.


Hamish



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs