[GRASS-dev] status and updates of datumtransform.table

[Hamish]

Paul wrote:
> Probably we should update datumtransform.table with the
> correct Belgium 72 parameters. But it would be reassuring to
> find out where the wrong ones have come from first...


.... and which ones are in fact "wrong" ...

I'm a bit surprised that Belgium is big enough to have two
regional sets with significant differences. How far appart are
points transformed using the two 7-term paramerts? 10s of meters?
just a few cm?


Hamish