[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #759: r.patch non-functional in WinGRASS 6.4 svn on Vista

GRASS GIS trac at osgeo.org
Fri Jan 8 18:51:01 EST 2010


#759: r.patch non-functional in WinGRASS 6.4 svn on Vista
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  cmbarton         |       Owner:  grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
      Type:  defect           |      Status:  new                      
  Priority:  critical         |   Milestone:  6.4.0                    
 Component:  Raster           |     Version:  6.4.0 RCs                
Resolution:                   |    Keywords:  r.patch, wingrass        
  Platform:  MSWindows Vista  |         Cpu:  Unspecified              
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by hellik):

 Replying to [comment:9 hamish]:
 > so if you copy/rename "r.patch.exe" to "r.fred.exe", does it then
 magically work on Vista?
 >
 > ?!
 >
 > if so, would a r.patch.bat wrapper script suffer the same fate?
 >
 >
 > How that would end up with a "Bad file number" error I have no idea.
 > (does that mean bad a FID? or stderr/stdout not existing, or..?)
 >
 >
 > Hamish

 WinGrass65 WinVista32

 r.patch.exe renamed to r.helli.exe and started from the msys-shell and the
 wx-gui-commandline:

 {{{
 GRASS 6.5.svn (nc_spm_08):c:/Users/syringia > r.helli input=extr1,extr2
 output
 =testpatch2
  100%
 Erstelle Supportdateien für die Rasterkarte <testpatch2>.
 }}}

 everything is working, the two rasters were patched. so it's really the
 name that causes the problems. what's about a batch-file, i don't know.

 i see also in the windows-file-explorer that both r.patch.exe and
 v.patch.exe are marked by WinVista with a win-symbol, so Vista really
 recognize only by the file-name that there could something
 important/dangerous for the system and activates the UAC.

 Helmut

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/759#comment:11>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list