[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #587: svn versions should better
reflect svn rev
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Tue Jan 12 06:37:51 EST 2010
#587: svn versions should better reflect svn rev
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: hamish | Owner: martinl
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 6.5.0
Component: default | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: | Keywords: g.version
Platform: All | Cpu: All
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by hamish):
* version: 6.4.0 RCs => svn-trunk
* milestone: 6.4.0 => 6.5.0
Comment:
Markus wrote:
> What is the state in GRASS 6.4? I tried right now and get:
This ''should'' be the revision of the latest commit to gis.h, which is
why the -r flag says "GIS library revision number and time". This is what
is important to qgis, core API, etc. The wx help->about window says "GIS
Library Revision" which I'm sure will still confuse some folks in the
absence of an over-all revision number, but none the less is fairly
clear..
> but indeed we are at [r40373]
note that is moslty just interesting for dev branch builds, for a tagged
release the exact version of the codebase that the version number refers
to is known.
> Perhaps we have to determine the rev version on compile time?
which is what the `svnversion -c` added to ./configure in trunk is
supposed to help with. I'm still waiting to gain confidence/test that this
will be ok for folks without svn tools installed and/or a regular internet
connection who have a copy of the snapshot to work with. Note the full
release tarballs have the .svn/ stuff stripped away so in a full release
`svnversion -c` or other tricks will not work.
bumping the target up to the devel branches.
Hamish
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/587#comment:41>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list