[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #1059: wxGUI: No menu option for
r.mapcalc
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Mon May 10 08:20:25 EDT 2010
#1059: wxGUI: No menu option for r.mapcalc
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: vesnikos | Owner: martinl
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: major | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: wxGUI | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: | Keywords: r.mapcalc wxGUI
Platform: Linux | Cpu: x86-32
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by mmetz):
Replying to [comment:14 martinl]:
> Replying to [comment:13 mmetz]:
> {{{
> > Index: gui/wxpython/xml/menudata.xml
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gui/wxpython/xml/menudata.xml (revision 42182)
> > +++ gui/wxpython/xml/menudata.xml (working copy)
> > @@ -1010,7 +1010,9 @@
> > <menuitem>
> > <label>Map calculator</label>
> > <help>Map calculator for raster map algebra</help>
> > + <keywords>raster</keywords>
> > <handler>DispMapCalculator</handler>
> > + <command>r.mapcalc</command>
> > </menuitem>
> > <menu>
> > <label>Neighborhood analysis</label>
> >
> }}}
>
> It shows [http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/WxPython-
based_GUI_for_GRASS#Map_Calculator wxGUI Map Calculator]. There is already
item for {{{r.mapcalc}}} in the menu
[source:grass/trunk/gui/wxpython/xml/menudata.xml at 42210#L1011]
I was talking about r42182, before this flood of changes came in. My diff
is against revision 42182, not revision 42210. In r42210, a lot of changes
have been made to the GUI and the module, some of the changes have been
changed again...
My point is that probably much less changes were required to make
r.mapcalc visible in the wxGUI command search, that the GUI should be
fixed first, before modules get broken by a quick fix, that the two
different interfaces for r.mapcalc are confusing, that more testing should
be done on the local copy before a commit, and that the Map Calculator
wxGUI interface is nice but unfinished work, no output, no help. I
personally would recommend to go back to r42182 and start anew, looking
for a solution that requires less modifications.
Sorry for the ranting, but even though trunk is the development version, I
would sometimes prefer some more testing before submitting changes, and a
flood of commits for the same problem within one day clearly indicates
that the first commits were not well thought through.
Markus M
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1059#comment:16>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list