[GRASS-dev] RE: [GRASS-user] Question with Python-SWIG example [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Glynn Clements]

Martin Landa wrote:

> >> It looks like I'm going to have to add a local copy of ctypesgen in
> >> order to ensure consistent behaviour.
> >
> > with a local copy of ctypesgen it's working.
> 
> I would vote to backport ctypes to devbr6. Concerning relbr64 we could
> probably disable swig for 6.4.0 and later backport ctypes for 6.4.1.
> What do you think about that?

Is there a reason not to add the ctypes stuff to 6.4.0? Even if there
are problems with it, they shouldn't interfere with the other Python
code (i.e. grass.script).

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>