[GRASS-dev] submission rules (svn -> trac)
Maris Nartiss
maris.gis at gmail.com
Fri Apr 13 02:38:00 EDT 2012
Hi,
submission rules shouldn't change too often and thus maintaining two
versions (GRASS 6 vs 7) shouldn't be a huge issue. Keeping them with
source has a benefit of being able to distribute them with source :)
Are there any other benefits besides "updating two versions"?
Just my 0.002 Verizon cents,
Maris.
2012. gada 13. aprīlis 01:53 Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> rakstīja:
> Hi,
>
> currently we need to maintain submission rule files in three different
> branches (trunk, devbr6, relbr64). I would suggest to move these
> documents from SVN to trac, similarly to GDAL [1]. In our case
> something like
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingC
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingPython
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingDocs
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingBash
>
> or
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingRules/C
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingRules/Python
> ...
>
> What's your opinion?
>
> Martin
>
> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc8_devguide
>
> --
> Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list