[GRASS-dev] [Proj] Proj Release - switched from using +datum= to a detailed definition in the EPSG init file.

[Helmut Kudrnovsky]

FYI from proj-ML:

see
http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2012-February/006123.html

>On 12-02-20 05:04 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>> On 12-02-09 3:40 PM, Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
>>> Frank,
>>>
>>> I would like to request a Proj release in the next couple of months. We
>>> are going to be doing security testing of our Lidar system which makes
>>> use of trunk proj for PDAL. I'd imagine that we will have a much easier
>>> time having a released version.
>>>
>>
>> Regular releases of Proj would also help package maintainers.
>
>Jeff / Mike,
>
>I have made a pass through the open PROJ.4 tickets and taken action on most
>of the recent ones.  I'm hoping to get some feedback on a couple of them.
>
>Two outstanding issues I'd like to address before a final release:
>
>1) Resolve whether it is appropriate for us to have switched from using
>+datum= to a detailed definition in the EPSG init file.  The GRASS folks
>have raised cain (cane?) about this.

Helmut

-----
best regards
Helmut
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Proj-Proj-Release-switched-from-using-datum-to-a-detailed-definition-in-the-EPSG-init-file-tp4492577p4492577.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.