[GRASS-dev] could r.stream.* become part of GRASS core?

[Newcomb, Doug]

+1

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> since the r.stream.* modules are continuously requested and IMHO
> sufficiently
> tested (according to user reports), I would move them to core if there are
> no objections.
>
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>



-- 
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newcomb at fws.gov
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20121115/46b98157/attachment.html>