[GRASS-dev] spanning tree and steiner tree problems?
Moritz Lennert
mlennert at club.worldonline.be
Tue Oct 9 00:18:59 PDT 2012
On 08/10/12 18:29, Michael Barton wrote:
> Then perhaps this spanning tree and Steiner net is different from
> what it used to do and what I've seen for a definition.
>
> By my understanding (and my recollection of previous behavior in
> 6.3), a Steiner tree and spanning net should produce similar, if not
> identical graphs (Steiner net is a type of spanning tree). They
> should be connecting all nodes via a set of shortest paths. That is,
> for 4 nodes, there should be a total of 4+3+2+1 = 10 total paths, not
> the complex set of paths in your graphic (same as mine BTW).
>
> If these are not connecting all nodes via a set of minimal paths,
> what ARE they doing?
The way I understand it:
- Spanning tree does not take into account specific nodes you add, but
uses all vertices of the network. This is why you cannot specify
specific nodes.
- Steiner network uses only the specific nodes you provide. This is why
you have the tcats options which allows you specify which nodes you want
to use.
And here's what wikipedia has to say:
"The Steiner tree problem is superficially similar to the minimum
spanning tree problem: given a set V of points (vertices), interconnect
them by a network (graph) of shortest length, where the length is the
sum of the lengths of all edges. The difference between the Steiner tree
problem and the minimum spanning tree problem is that, in the Steiner
tree problem, extra intermediate vertices and edges may be added to the
graph in order to reduce the length of the spanning tree. These new
vertices introduced to decrease the total length of connection are known
as Steiner points or Steiner vertices. It has been proved that the
resulting connection is a tree, known as the Steiner tree. There may be
several Steiner trees for a given set of initial vertices."
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steiner_tree_problem)
Moritz
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list