[GRASS-dev] Help -> "About GRASS" broken

[Helena Mitasova]

Hamish,

do you still need devbr6 (6.5)?

I thought that there was a broad consensus that devb6 (65) is not needed and can be retired
so that we have only 6.4.3 relbr64 and trunk 7.

Helena


On Sep 20, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Martin Landa wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 2012/9/20 Maris Nartiss <maris.gis at gmail.com>:
>> I changed code a bit to not fail so hard in r53238 (6.4) and r53239
>> (7). Added one extra string 'unknown'
> 
> is there any reason why you skipped 6.5? It's strange to fix it in
> release branch and not in dev branch... It source of problems we have
> with inconsistency between relbr64 and devbr6. Too many branches...
> (my opinion is still the same, to kill devb6).
> 
> Martin
> 
> -- 
> Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev