[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #1874: latitudinal bias in sample points created with r.random
Paulo van Breugel
p.vanbreugel at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 02:55:36 PST 2013
Not only in theory, I actually use it all the time :-). And you can
achieve the same by setting all the areas outside your target area to
NULL. I like how the combination of the two gives you a fine control
over how you want to sample an area. You can even do the same with the
cover layer. Although to be honest, I don't really see the added value
of having this option to define a cover layer, but that is another point.
By the way, it seems the issue of under-sampling was solved too? At
least, in the limited trials I did, when generating random points I am
actually getting the requested number of sample points, which I didn't
previously! Super!!
Cheers,
Paulo
On 02/07/2013 09:39 AM, Markus Metz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Paulo van Breugel
> <p.vanbreugel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks pointing it out. I have actually used the script some time ago. I
>> think I found that it becomes a bit slow when working with large number of
>> points, but I am going to try in grass 7, see if it is any faster due to
>> faster vector handling.
>>
> In theory, r.random should work for irregular areas if you set a MASK.
>
> Markus M
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Paulo
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:44 AM, GRASS GIS <trac at osgeo.org> wrote:
>>> #1874: latitudinal bias in sample points created with r.random
>>>
>>> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
>>> Reporter: pvanbosgeo | Owner: grass-dev@…
>>> Type: defect | Status: new
>>> Priority: major | Milestone: 7.0.0
>>> Component: Raster | Version: svn-trunk
>>> Keywords: r.random | Platform: Linux
>>> Cpu: x86-64 |
>>>
>>> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Comment(by hamish):
>>>
>>> > It's internal
>>>
>>> (a friend was terrible with apostrophes and to/too/two & after too many
>>> emails it begins to look natural and the bad habit has rubbed off on me!
>>> argh!)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1874#comment:6>
>>> GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-dev mailing list
>> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20130207/15206600/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list