[GRASS-dev] GRASS 7 wish: Keyword index

[Vaclav Petras]

Thinking about the style of keywords.html page, I discovered that the
h2 and h3 have the same font-size in CSS [1]. Is it an intention?

And about the style itself. I would suggest to use description (dl)
instead of bullet list. The change in code is small but I don't want
to do it without asking others.

[1] http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/grassdocs.css

On 12 March 2013 11:43, Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> On 12/03/13 11:21, Markus Neteler wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Moritz Lennert
>> <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't followed this close enough, but could someone explain the
>>> difference between the two ?
>>
>>
>> Just open both :)
>>
>> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/keywords.html
>> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/topics.html
>>
>>> And why (as an example) r.kappa should be in
>>> the classification as keyword list and not in the classification as topic
>>> list ?
>>
>>
>> 1) The raster/vector/... pages depend on the *first* keyword.
>>
>> 2) The topics.html page(s) depends *only* on the second keyword.
>>
>> 3) The new keywords.html shows *all* keywords.
>
>
> Except for the major (blacklisted) ones such as raster, vector, display,
> etc.
>
> So, the main difference is how many keywords are used. I still believe that
> one such page should be enough (and more will create confusion), and I think
> keywords.html is the way to go (more complete, easy to use). But if others
> see a use in topics.html, I won't make a fight of it ;-)
>
> Moritz
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev