[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-user] minimal wxPython version

Michael Barton Michael.Barton at asu.edu
Wed Mar 20 10:44:55 PDT 2013

You can always use shell. But this is a question about 1) the graphical interface, and 2) python libraries for advanced commands and use in scripting.

C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity 
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Arizona State University

voice: 	480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC)
fax:          480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu

On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:31 AM, kapo coulibaly <kmcoulib at gmail.com>

> How about sticking with shell? We wouldn't worry about endless version issues.
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pietro <peter.zamb at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Michael Barton <Michael.Barton at asu.edu> wrote:
> > My understanding is that Python 3 is not backward compatible with Python 2.
> it is true, but we are not talking to require python3 instead of
> python2, we are talking to require python2.6 instead of python2.4,
> that it is not backward compatible.
> Changing python2.4 in python2.6 allow us to start preparing the code
> to reduce the gap between python2 and python3. Therefore if one day in
> the 2016 or later (may be for GRASS8), we decide to switch definitely
> to python3 we should be able to switch without too much effort.
> Pietro
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20130320/5de27957/attachment.html>

More information about the grass-dev mailing list