[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #1838: r.mask: allow use of vector map as input
Paulo van Breugel
p.vanbreugel at gmail.com
Mon May 20 07:43:39 PDT 2013
+ 1
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:32 PM, GRASS GIS <trac at osgeo.org> wrote:
> #1838: r.mask: allow use of vector map as input
>
> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
> Type: enhancement | Status: closed
> Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
> Component: Raster | Version: svn-trunk
> Resolution: fixed | Keywords: mask, vector, r.mask
> Platform: Unspecified | Cpu: Unspecified
>
> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>
> Comment(by hamish):
>
> To be honest, I find it hard to justify not running `v.to.rast` + r.mask
> as a two step process. You either respect the current region setting, or
> the v.to.rast operation is partially undefined. Having the module change
> the region (and if so, internally, via WIND_OVERRIDE & the
> grass.use_temp_region() python function) for any reason seems like a
> slight misfeature to me.
>
> Consider the case that the vector is much larger than the raster (national
> coastline, I'm offen making coastal "land.mask" rasters from that), you
> wouldn't want to rasterize the entire country at the current raster
> resolution. Of course it's possible to only shrink the region with a
> little scripting work, and it could be a nice efficiency trick to do that,
> but be careful that the logic for it might fail for lat/lon near the
> dateline)
>
>
> do one thing well,
> Hamish
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1838#comment:8>
> GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20130520/e5b0cd4f/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list