[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #560: WinGRASS not deleting temp ppm files from map display
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Tue May 28 13:55:12 PDT 2013
#560: WinGRASS not deleting temp ppm files from map display
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: isaacullah | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 6.4.3
Component: Display | Version: 6.4.0 RCs
Keywords: v.digit ppm temp, wingrass | Platform: MSWindows XP
Cpu: x86-32 |
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment(by hamish):
Ok, if $GISRC is custom you'd get tmp files in weird places. (render.py
could test if the getenv string started with "/tmp/grassX-" before using
that, otherwise use $TMPDIR?)
Right or wrong, many modules leave left-over files in $MAPSET/.tmp/,
either due to design or a crash, and wherever they are it's rather nice
that they get cleaned up automatically by the clean_temp program (if users
wish to bypass normal startup and not run clean_temp, then it's their
responsibility to look after that manually). What I am looking for with
the `dirname $GISRC` idea is some way to replicate that auto-cleanup for
GUI .ppm files that are forgotten, undeletable-at-runtime on Windows, and
the residual results of the GUI crashing before cleaning itself up.
it's probably mainly of concern for large raster maps, where it's not a
concern at all since in $MAPSET/.tmp/, but fwiw it's good to consider that
/tmp/ is often on a much smaller filesystem than $GISDBASE. For example,
v.in.ascii might make a multi GB tempfile during its scanning step.
> Most uses of G_tempfile() are wrong
what's the potential downside of that? why "wrong" instead of "different"?
i.e. is it theoretically wrong or practically wrong?
thanks,
Hamish
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/560#comment:22>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list