[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-PSC] too many branches => retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

[Yann Chemin]

+1
I also think we should stop GRASS 6 development


On 6 April 2014 19:01, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>:
>
> > Hamish, maybe you could be the official grass6 maintainer, managing the
> > whole grass6 development in the way you propose, i.e. any new development
> > and bugfixes first go into grass6dev for a period of testing, before
> _you_
> > make the decision that something can be backported to grass6release. I do
> > think however, that for this to work, we would need to regularly publish
> > snapshots of grass6dev for easy testing.
>
> I think we should really stop thinking about GRASS 6 "development",
> ideally we should fully focus our energy on GRASS 7. We do not have
> enough man-power for keeping development in GRASS 6, simply saying. So
> please bug fix only should go there (relbr64). No new functionality.
>
> Martin
>
> --
> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>



-- 
----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20140407/7e4a79ef/attachment.html>