[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2409: last call for options keys consolidation
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Tue Dec 9 08:20:14 PST 2014
#2409: last call for options keys consolidation
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: standardized options | Platform: Unspecified
Cpu: Unspecified |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by hcho):
Replying to [comment:111 annakrat]:
> Replying to [comment:108 martinl]:
>
> > Personally I would tend to rename just
>
> * element name `raster_3d` (or `raster3d`)
> * module options e.g. `d.legend raster_3d`
>
> > I would not touch names of the modules, some of them already use
shorten names, eg. `d.rast.leg`, so I would keep `rast3d`. Similarly I
would not touch python module names.
> >
> > Any opinion from other devs?
>
> I don't really like the underscore, I would go with raster3d, I think we
can manage to type raster3d because 3D rasters are generally not used as
often as rasters.
I agree. I don't like the underscore either. Maybe, the parser could treat
numbers just like the underscore so that we can shorten raster3d as r3.
>
> I would keep the names of modules as they are now.
Like Martin mentioned, I don't think we need to change module names if we
go for raster3d because other modules already use short names.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2409#comment:113>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list