[GRASS-dev] Addons builds and manuals

[Vaclav Petras]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Vaclav,
>
> 2014-12-09 20:27 GMT+01:00 Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>:
>
> > The addons manual pages are still not built for some addons. I haven't
> > checked all but I checked the recent ones. The page claims to be updated
> > daily and the date I see in page info actually is Mon 08 Dec 2014
> 09:05:01
> > PM EST. Is there a log somewhere? Or some list where the modules should
> be
> > added?
> >
> > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/v.surf.n
> <http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/v.surf.nnbathy.html>
> trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/tools/addonsnbathy.html
> <http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/v.surf.nnbathy.html>
> > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/r.surf.nnbathy.html
> > (http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/m.surf.nnbathy.html)
> > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/i.theilsen.html
> > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/addons/r.futures.html
> >
> >
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/grass7/misc/m.surf.nnbathy
> >
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/grass7/imagery/i.theilsen
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.futures
>
> now should be OK. The manual has been updated for long time. I have
> fixed all scripts.
>
>
Thanks. It's good to know that you provided all scripts to build addons.

http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/tools/addons?rev=63481


> > By the way, I'm wondering if m.surf.nnbathy is the right choice of name.
> > There is no standard for two different modules in one directory but
> > m.surf.nnbathy looks like a module name but is not. For example, r.colors
> > contains also r3.colors. That's not ideal but it does not introduce false
> > module name m.colors (m if for misc not mix anyway).
>
> Hm, I just wonder what name would be better v.surf.nnbathy or
> r.surf.nnbathy...
>

Me too but I guess that any of them will do. I don't know what is more
native from the point of view of the modules, this could be one way how to
decide. The other is what is the common use case (at least from the point
of view of the author). I would say that it is v.surf.nnbathy would be the
more used one, you usually interpolate points.

>
> Martin
>
> --
> Martin Landa
> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20141211/b63a669a/attachment-0001.html>