[GRASS-dev] [Qgis-developer] GRASS & QGIS: the future
Paolo Cavallini
cavallini at faunalia.it
Thu Mar 27 04:40:45 PDT 2014
Il 27/03/2014 12:33, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
> I would vote for dropping the plugin and just updating the processing
> plugin. Having both ways is bad for us and bad for users, even worse
> when some functions are missing from one but not in the other.
I understand well the point; however, the plugin has additional
functions, e.g.:
* a grass shell
* a grass data browser
* a grass digitizing environment.
Whether these are important or not, it's a matter of users.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list