[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r60304 - grass/trunk/raster/r.colors

[Huidae Cho]

Sure. I'll do that later today.
On May 18, 2014 7:22 AM, "Helmut Kudrnovsky" <hellik at web.de> wrote:

> Huidae Cho wrote
> > I didn't do much backporting till now. I think it's time to read that
> wiki
> > page. Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Martin Landa <
>
> > landa.martin@
>
> > >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2014-05-18 11:49 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa <
>
> > landa.martin@
>
> > >:
> >> > please consider backporting such trivial changes to relbr70... [1].
> >>
> >> see also http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/HowToBackport
> >>
> >> It's seems that you do not consider any backporing till now...
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-dev mailing list
>
> > grass-dev at .osgeo
>
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
> IMHO r60308 "r.stream.*: Name of input/Name for output" should also be
> considered to be backported to relbr70.
>
>
>
> -----
> best regards
> Helmut
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-GRASS-SVN-r60304-grass-trunk-raster-r-colors-tp5140994p5141000.html
> Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20140518/d06af631/attachment-0001.html>