[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2296: r.stream.* - unify some functions (avoid code duplication)
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Sun May 18 13:37:18 PDT 2014
#2296: r.stream.* - unify some functions (avoid code duplication)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: hellik | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Raster | Version: svn-trunk
Keywords: r.stream.* | Platform: All
Cpu: All |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by hellik):
Replying to [comment:1 glynn]:
> Replying to [ticket:2296 hellik]:
>
> > to avoid code duplication, some functions should be unified over these
modules in a lib(?)
>
> While we're at it, maybe we should look into unifying all of the
different "segment" libraries.
>
> They all do essentially the same thing: provide a 2-dimensional array
which may be too large to fit into RAM (or, more accurately, into the
process' address space; if RAM was the issue, mmap() etc would suffice),
and which can be accessed (more or less) randomly.
>
> Apart from the "official" segment library (lib/segment), r.proj has its
own, r.stream.* each have their own, r.grow.distance has something simpler
(the temporary file is read row-by-row but in reverse).
{{{
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/lib/segment
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.grow.distance
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.proj
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.stream.extract
}}}
unifying all of the different "segment" libraries may be a good choice.
worth to open a new ticket?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2296#comment:2>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list