[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r60310 - in grass/branches/releasebranch_7_0: . raster/r.colors

Huidae Cho grass4u at gmail.com
Mon May 19 07:24:11 PDT 2014


Does that mean it's better to commit mergeinfo to avoid duplicate merges by
mistake? I think since this is metadata, it shouldn't affect the source
tree.
On May 19, 2014 8:13 AM, "Glynn Clements" <glynn at gclements.plus.com> wrote:

>
> Martin Landa wrote:
>
> > >> please for the next time exclude svn:mergeinfo from backport commit
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > it was common practice till now (for those devs how do backporting).
> > It's minor issue for me, I have no strong option (I was used to
> > exclude this svn prop as not useful).
>
> "svn merge" uses that information to avoid applying the same changes
> twice.
>
> --
> Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20140519/9783c1e2/attachment.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list