[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2305: i.atcorr landsat8 support

[Nick Ves]

The band follow that order (if i remember correcty) because they are
ordered by ascending wavelength since its the same scema the other
sensors follow.

No reason not to change the order if its needed

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:10 PM, GRASS GIS <trac at osgeo.org> wrote:
> #2305: i.atcorr landsat8 support
> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>   Reporter:  vesnikos     |       Owner:  grass-dev@…
>       Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  closed
>   Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  7.0.0
>  Component:  Imagery      |     Version:  svn-trunk
> Resolution:  fixed        |    Keywords:  Landsat, i.atcorr
>   Platform:  Linux        |         Cpu:  x86-64
> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>
> Comment(by neteler):
>
>  Replying to [comment:7 nikosa]:
>  > While scripting an i.landsat.atcorr module, wouldn't it be "ok" to keep
>  the official order of Landsat's 8 band_designation?
>
>  Yes, would make more sense.
>
>  > Currently, in i.atcorr the order is:
>  >
>  > 1: 115, 2: 116, 3: 117, 4: 118, 8: 119, 5: 120, 9: 121, 6: 122, 7: 123
>  >
>  > Why not:
>  >
>  > 1: 115, 2: 116, 3: 117, 4: 118, 5: 119, 6: 120, 7: 121, 8: 122, 9: 123
>  >
>  > ?
>
>  I guess that's how the original patch was provided. Can you manage to
>  prepare a patch for the modification?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2305#comment:8>
> GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
>