[GRASS-dev] check on GRASS revision number

[Markus Neteler]

On Nov 26, 2014 8:02 PM, "Michael Barton" <Michael.Barton at asu.edu> wrote:
>
> Will this be the case for all extensions built against a revision of
current - 1?

Today yes, due to an API change in libgis.

> If so, then there is no point in installing any binary module.

Why?

As soon as G7 is stable these changes will unlikely or at least only very
rarely occur.

Markus

> Michael
> ____________________
> C. Michael Barton
> Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
> Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
> Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science
> Arizona State University
>
> voice:  480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC)
> fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
> www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2014-11-26 19:32 GMT+01:00 Michael Barton <Michael.Barton at asu.edu>:
> >> ERROR: Module built against version $Revision: 61095 $ but trying to
use
> >>       version $Revision: 62364 $. You need to rebuild GRASS GIS or
> >>       untangle multiple installations.
> >
> > you need to rebuild extension
> >
> > g.extension.all ope=rebuild
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > --
> > Martin Landa
> > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> > http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20141126/241e45ad/attachment-0001.html>