[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2409: last call for options keys consolidation
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Thu Nov 27 06:28:45 PST 2014
#2409: last call for options keys consolidation
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: standardized options | Platform: Unspecified
Cpu: Unspecified |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by martinl):
Replying to [comment:47 wenzeslaus]:
> > It means that current abbreviated option will still work expect of
`rast3d` which needs to be renamed to `volume`.
>
> Why to volume? Although there was no agreement, we were often replacing
all "voxel" and
I was discussing that with MarkusN and MarkusM and we didn't find a better
solution. Element 'volume' has big advantage: shorten 'rast' will still
work. Moreover 'rast3d' was somehow weird, "Volume" is used in the GUI
(menu).
> "volumne" (and others) by "3D raster" so far. The only three places I
know about where
"Voxel" is an element of the 3D grid. I would stay in the manual with "3D
raster map" or "volume map".
> I'm personally against "volume" because this term means too much other
things. (Does volume computations refer to 3D raster/voxels/voxel models
or to cubic meters of soil or water?) It
Feel free to suggest better solution. We don't want to use shorten element
names, we would prefer that shorten names will still work (`g.list rast`).
> If we are be replacing "3D raster", we should do it everywhere including
manual and module family name
([http://grass.osgeo.org/grass71/manuals/raster3D.html Manual: Raster3D
commands]).
No, I would stay with "3D raster map" or "volume map". We just changed
element list name, nothing else.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2409#comment:48>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list