[GRASS-dev] g.list in G71

[Huidae Cho]

-p as default is only good for the command line because in python scripts,
you need more typing. The previous discussion was about making this module
as friendly as possible both in the command line and scripting environments.

Reverting -m flag is fine with me unless anyone has strong arguments
against it.



On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Anna Petrášová <kratochanna at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Huidae Cho <grass4u at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> IMO, printing fully-qualified names by default can be too much
>> information in terminal and make it uncomfortable to read map names only.
>> Currently, it prints fully-qualified names whenever maps cannot be
>> identified by their unqualified names (e.g., two maps with the same name in
>> multiple mapsets).
>>
>
> Maybe there was a discussion already about this, but another option is to
> use -p as default (so that we actually see the mapsets) and add new flag
>  -g as shell script style? So that the default would be the same as g.list
> before?
>
> If I should decide between with/without mapset (the original question), I
> think by default the mapset should be printed. The mapset information is
> more important for me than the clutter it causes.
>
> Anna
>
>
>> Huidae
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 28 October 2014 10:44, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> > 2014-10-27 21:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
>>> >> I would suggest to print fully-qualified names by default. Any
>>> opinion? Martin
>>> >
>>> > If you agree I would vote for reverting logic of -m flag to
>>> >
>>> > Print unqualified map names (without mapsets)
>>> >
>>> > ?
>>> >
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> > Martin
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ciao
>>> Luca
>>>
>>> http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
>>> www.lucadelu.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> grass-dev mailing list
>>> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-dev mailing list
>> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20141029/72c1adb5/attachment.html>