[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2437: order parameters in g.remove window
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Wed Oct 29 08:38:31 PDT 2014
#2437: order parameters in g.remove window
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: pvanbosgeo | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.1.0
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: g.list, g.remove, g.mlist, g.mremove | Platform: All
Cpu: Unspecified |
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment(by mlennert):
Replying to [comment:29 annakrat]:
> Replying to [comment:28 hcho]:
> > Replying to [comment:27 mlennert]:
> > > Replying to [comment:26 annakrat]:
> > > > I am generally against implementing any special things for one
module (which has autogenerated dialog).
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Moritz
> >
> > Yeah.. +1 too. What about just getting rid of that flag completely and
using g.list instead? While updating python scripts, I found it's just too
much typing to add flags="f" every time and it doesn't make much sense in
scripting anyway. Since the API of g.remove is compatible with g.list API
as far as search patterns are concerned, it's a matter of changing module
names. Is it too dangerous?
>
> I am afraid it is. Especially when users are used to it from the
previous interface. Using -f flag only when using pattern/exclude would
make more sense if want to avoid using it every time, but I understand why
you don't like it. Some more input from others would be appreciated...
I don't mind having the -f flag as extra security, even though it does add
typing an extra 3 characters to the former use of g.remove.
+1 for keeping the -f for all types of map selection.
Moritz
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2437#comment:30>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list