[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2402: v.distance in Long/Lat Locations on GRASS 7.0
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Sun Sep 14 04:15:43 PDT 2014
#2402: v.distance in Long/Lat Locations on GRASS 7.0
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: micha | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: | Platform: All
Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mlennert):
Replying to [comment:6 mmetz]:
> Replying to [comment:5 mlennert]:
> > Replying to [comment:4 mmetz]:
> > > Replying to [ticket:2402 micha]:
> > > > In stable version 6.4, when working in a Long-Lat LOCATION,
v.distance returns geodesic distance on a sphere in meters (in the cases
of point to point, and point to line).
> > >
> > > > In GRASS 7.0 this feature is lost, and distances are always
returned in the LOCATION units (i.e. degrees in a Long-Lat LOCATION).
Geodesic distance should be the preferred behavior.
> > >
> > > Fixed for trunk in r61850.
> >
> > With the NC-data reprojected to EPSG 4326, I get the following now:
> >
> >
> {{{
> v.distance -p from=comm_colleges to=comm_colleges upload=dist col=dist
dmin=0.0001
>
> Finding nearest features...
> 100%
> 100%
> from_cat|dist
> 1|null
> 2|null
> 3|null
> [...]
> 55|null
> 56|null
> 57|null
> 58|null
> 100%
> 58 categories - no nearest feature found
> }}}
> >
>
> Oops. Fixed in r61861.
I just found a difference in distances calculated with grass6 and grass7
for points to areas (see explanation in #2401). Needs checking.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2402#comment:7>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list