[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-PSC] RFC4 discussion call

Margherita Di Leo diregola at gmail.com
Wed Jan 7 14:36:03 PST 2015


I read the document and support it,

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> Last doubts:
> * Step1: .... "The Project manager (or if exists the Release manager)
> then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support
> for this proposal. "
> --> this "sufficient" is still a bit elastic. If one developer is
> against it, others in favour, it is fine to start? Leave it to
> democratical debates? Just to be sure.

To me this makes sense, because it's a good thing that the release manager
should have the chance to make a decision on a case by case basis. I'm more
in favor of do-ocracy rather than democratical debate ;-) but it's just my

> > Just a minor comment is that we shall probably clearly specify who is
> > responsible for the mentioned actions: call for soft, hard freeze etc.
> That's the release manager. But I added that now (looks more dramatic
> than it is, trac doesn't highlight well this time).:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=16&old_version=13
> ... makes sense?


Thank you

Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-leo at jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20150107/c8e2e47b/attachment.html>

More information about the grass-dev mailing list