[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r65425 - in grass-addons/grass7/raster: . r.seg

[Vaclav Petras]

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

>
> On Jun 9, 2015 7:03 PM, "Vaclav Petras" <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:51 AM, <svn_grass at osgeo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Author: avitti
> >> Date: 2015-06-09 05:51:48 -0700 (Tue, 09 Jun 2015)
> >> New Revision: 65425
> >>
> >> Added:
> >>    grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.seg/
> >>    grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.seg/Makefile
> >>    grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.seg/main.c
> >>    grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.seg/r.seg.html
> >>    grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.seg/varseg.c
> >>    grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.seg/varseg.h
> >> Log:
> >> Piece-wise smooth approximation and discontinuity detection
> >
> >
> > r.seg now available for GRASS GIS 7.
>
> It was there for some years :)
> The name is r.segment.
>

r.segment was actually the reason why I remembered r.seg but I was pretty
sure that it is something different since r.seg was not ported last time I
was considered using it which was apparently more than 16 months ago
(r58886: ported r.seg GRASS 6 Addon to GRASS 7).

https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/58886

Maybe I'm missing something?
>

It seems that there are no changes in the core code.


> Markus
>
> > Nice! I was just thinking today that somebody should do that, what a
> coincidence.
> >
> > For others, in this case creating new files was the right course of
> action but in general it is better to use `svn cp` which preserves the
> history of the old version.
> >
> > Vaclav
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-dev mailing list
> > grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20150609/71fc14f9/attachment.html>