[GRASS-dev] is it time to release GRASS71?
Moritz Lennert
mlennert at club.worldonline.be
Thu Feb 25 06:34:12 PST 2016
On 25/02/16 13:45, Vaclav Petras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com
> <mailto:landa.martin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> 2016-02-25 8:59 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge at gmail.com
> <mailto:lucadeluge at gmail.com>>:
> > I support this, but I think it should be 7.2 not 7.1. Usually stable
> > version is even number
> >https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release
> > only 6.3 was an exception
>
> then we should probably rename milestone from 7.1. to 7.2 [1]. Ma
>
>
>
> What would be the point in skipping the one version? Or why stable and
> unstable versions? How many times we did that? Last time we did that was
> 10 years back. Is it user-friendly? I don't think so.
>
> I don't understand this no odd numbers versioning. Please explain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Odd-numbered_versions_for_development_releases
I don't have a strong opinion either way, as I don't think that this
scheme is so strong in people's heads that they would be surprised by a
7.1, it hasn't really been followed much in GRASS' history.
Moritz
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list