[GRASS-dev] Upcoming 7.2.0: review which addons to move to core

[Rainer M Krug]

Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote:
>> Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> writes:
>>> This is out-of-topic here, but similarly we might want to introduce
>>> something like [deprecated] for modules, options and flags.
>>>
> ...
>>> Related to that, I wonder if we should create some standard
>>> mechanism for introducing experimental things - things which might
>>> later show as unstable,
>>> not useful or buggy. For example, I introduced v.decimate which is
>>> now in 7.2 branch. It has its merit but I started to think that
>>> perhaps a different set of
>>> functions or interface can be more useful there. I wonder if I
>>> should just put [experimental - use with care] at the end of the
>>> module description.
>>
>> I would add the following:
>>
>> 1) add [experimental] / [beta] / ... behind the in the menu
>> 2) disable the experimental / beta / ... addons
>> 3) add an option to enable all the experimental / beta / ... addons, which can than state
>> "experimental, might make your computer explode, use at own risk and only in
>> well ventilated rooms"...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Rainer
>
> Please open a dedicated ticket for this.

Done:

https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3092

Rainer

>
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

-- 
Rainer M. Krug
email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de
PGP: 0x0F52F982
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 454 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20160705/f621555f/attachment.sig>