[GRASS-dev] v.what.rast: topology really necessary?

Blumentrath, Stefan Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no
Tue Jan 10 04:18:21 PST 2017

Hi Martin,

Thanks for your swift relpy. Unfortunately, without topology, v.what.rast segfaults in r70332.

v.external --overwrite input=PG:dbname=gisdata layer=points output=points_pg73ot -bo
v.what.rast map=points_pg73ot raster=rand column=morphology
Reading features from vector map...
Segmentation fault (core dumped)


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Landa [mailto:landa.martin at gmail.com] 
Sent: tirsdag 10. januar 2017 12.40
To: Blumentrath, Stefan <Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no>
Cc: GRASS developers list (grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org) <grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] v.what.rast: topology really necessary?

Hi Stefan,

2017-01-10 11:09 GMT+01:00 Blumentrath, Stefan <Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no>:
> Is there any reason that v.what.rast requires topology level 2? “r.what”
> works without topology…

AFAIU, topology is not required. I change that in r70331 (trunk).
After some testing could be backported to relbr72. Ma

Martin Landa

More information about the grass-dev mailing list