[GRASS-dev] Landsat 8 Collection-1 QA bits

Nikos Alexandris nik at nikosalexandris.net
Sun Jun 10 11:25:38 PDT 2018


the commit was about i.landsat8.swlt. I was, however, in the parent
directory when actually executing the commit command. This, included
minor changes in i.landsat8.qc. Nothing serious, as I see now.

Still, I would like to learn how I could revert partially a commit, if

For the QA module, https://gitlab.com/NikosAlexandris/i.landsat8.qa is a
separate module. Note s/qc/qa/. We can keep both for the time being?

Thanks, Nikos

* Stefan Blumentrath <Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no> [2018-06-09 10:08:57 +0000]:

>Hei Nikos,
>No worries. Did not have the time to test, but if your changes make Collection 1 work, why reverting?
>Happy to see you following up!
>And if something by accident is not working as expected, let us rather fix your updated version than reverting your commit.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nikos Alexandris <nik at nikosalexandris.net>
>Sent: lørdag 9. juni 2018 08:00
>To: Stefan Blumentrath <Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no>
>Cc: GRASS-GIS development mailing list <grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>Subject: Re: Landsat 8 Collection-1 QA bits
>Stefan, svn committers,
>in syncing the i.landsat8.swlst module, I just unintentionally committed local changes I had for `i.landsat8.qc`. I am sorry for that. What is the best way to revert only this module in this case?
>Thank you, Nikos
>* Nikos Alexandris <nik at nikosalexandris.net> [2018-06-05 12:07:52 +0200]:
>>>Hi Nikos,
>>>Thanks for the heads-up and updates on this matter.
>>>Since GUI cannot be changed dynamically based on selected options, I
>>>guess removing Pre-collection QA bits altogether is the most sensible
>>>solution? Alternatively, the module could be split into two: one for
>>>Pre-collection and one collection-1 version...
>>This option, here https://gitlab.com/NikosAlexandris/i.landsat8.qa. Let
>>me know what you think (sorry for rewording names and comments).
>>Manual not updated.
>>>If Pre-Collection products are removed, it might be more convenient to
>>>change the rules to the new collection products?
>>>Feel free to implement changes you prefer...
>>>Cheers Stefan
>Nikos Alexandris | Remote Sensing & Geomatics GPG Key Fingerprint 6F9D4506F3CA28380974D31A9053534B693C4FB3

Nikos Alexandris | Remote Sensing & Geomatics
GPG Key Fingerprint 6F9D4506F3CA28380974D31A9053534B693C4FB3 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20180610/2ba2f75d/attachment.sig>

More information about the grass-dev mailing list