[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #3757: Python3: range vs xrange

[GRASS GIS]

#3757: Python3: range vs xrange
-------------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  neteler      |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
     Type:  defect       |     Status:  new
 Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.8.0
Component:  Python       |    Version:  svn-trunk
 Keywords:  python3      |        CPU:  Unspecified
 Platform:  Unspecified  |
-------------------------+-------------------------
 In r74088 xrange() was changed to range(). If that change is fine, should
 these other xrange() usages also be changed?

 {{{
 ag --python " in xrange"
 doc/python/raster_example_ctypes.py
 67:for row_n in xrange(rows):

 lib/python/temporal/abstract_space_time_dataset.py
 1146:                >>> for i in xrange(3):

 lib/python/temporal/spatio_temporal_relationships.py
 423:#        for i in xrange(len(maps)):
 425:#            for j in xrange(offset, len(maps)):

 lib/python/pygrass/modules/interface/module.py
 64:    >>> for i in xrange(5):
 87:    >>> for i in xrange(5):
 111:    >>> for i in xrange(3):

 lib/python/pygrass/raster/__init__.py
 412:            >>> for row in xrange(map_a.info.rows):
 442:            >>> for i in xrange(4):
 479:            >>> for row in xrange(map_a.info.rows):
 480:            ...     for col in xrange(map_a.info.cols):

 lib/python/pygrass/vector/basic.py
 384:    >>> for cat in xrange(100, 110): cats.set(cat, layer=cat-50)

 lib/python/pygrass/vector/__init__.py
 87:        #return (self.read(f_id) for f_id in
 xrange(self.num_of_features()))
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3757>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>