[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #3860: GRASS GIS producing different slope than GDAL
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Mon Jun 10 13:09:15 PDT 2019
#3860: GRASS GIS producing different slope than GDAL
------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mazingaro | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 7.6.2
Component: Raster | Version: unspecified
Resolution: | Keywords: slope
CPU: x86-64 | Platform: Linux
------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by mazingaro):
Replying to [comment:9 mankoff]:
> I think the issue is related to the region.
>
> The `r.slope.aspect` documentation in the NOTES section implies that the
region is adjusted to the raster. I do not find that to be the case.
Specifically in the NC test data, I've created the following slope
rasters, and then looked at their univariate statistics:
>
> {{{
> g.region raster=elevation
> r.slope.aspect elevation=elevation slope=slope_0
> r.slope.aspect -a elevation=elevation slope=slope_1
> g.region res=30 -pa
> r.slope.aspect elevation=elevation slope=slope_2
> r.slope.aspect -a elevation=elevation slope=slope_3
>
> for i in $(seq 0 3); do
> (echo -n "slope_${i} "; r.univar slope_${i} | grep range) | tr '\n' '
'
> done
> }}}
>
> Results are:
>
> {{{
> slope_0 range: 36.3347
> slope_1 range: 36.3347
> slope_2 range: 13.7754
> slope_3 range: 25.3968
> }}}
Ok, thank you. I am going to close the ticket then.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3860#comment:10>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list