[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #4020: r.in.lidar / v.in.lidar missing in Ubunutgis package
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Tue Jan 14 03:03:07 PST 2020
#4020: r.in.lidar / v.in.lidar missing in Ubunutgis package
------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: sbl | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Packaging | Version: unspecified
Resolution: | Keywords: Ubuntugis
CPU: All | Platform: Linux
------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by Bas Couwenberg):
libLAS is deprecated and PDAL should be used instead, the
[https://liblas.org/ libLAS website] documents this:
> As of 2018, libLAS has been replaced by the [https://pdal.io/ PDAL]
project and it is in hibernation or maintenance mode. libLAS does not
provide support for LAS or LAZ 1.4, which PDAL does. PDAL also provides
support for many more formats, the notion of
[https://www.pdal.io/pipeline.html PDAL pipelines], Python support, and
has packages for OSGeo4W, !Docker/Ubuntu/Alpine, and OSX Homebrew.
Additionally, libLAS’ Python capabilities are much better expressed by the
pure-Python [http://laspy.org laspy] library, and if manipulating LAS data
in Python is your ultimate desire, use that instead of libLAS.
The liblas package has been from Debian, and hence the grass package is
only built with pdal. Because the grass package in UbuntuGIS uses the same
source as Debian it likewise no longer supports liblas.
While liblas is still available in Ubuntu bionic, their next LTS (focal)
won't have it either as it was removed in eoan.
Functionality provided by *.in.lidar should be ported to their *.in.pdal
counterparts or port *.in.lidar to use PDAL instead of libLAS.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/4020#comment:1>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list